I enjoyed this. I found it interesting that when the idea of AI reaching the point of being able to replicate human writing came up, Marriott’s main reservation was the impact it would have on those in his profession (i.e., the Luddite argument) whereas Leslie was searching for a deeper, ethical, or other argument for keeping writing/art in the hands of humans.
Sadly, my attention span for podcasts is incredibly limited so I copy and pasted the transcript for this into Word and asked copilot to summarize, this was the result:
"AI and Writing in the Age of Machines
The conversation delved into the intricate dynamics of AI's role in the realm of writing, highlighting its strengths and limitations. While AI demonstrates remarkable proficiency in generating well-structured and stylistically appealing prose, it is unable to emulate the depth, intentionality, and purpose that come from human experience. The participants discussed how AI democratizes writing by enabling more people to produce content of acceptable quality, but it falls short in capturing the innate human curiosity, emotional nuances, and authentic voice that characterize impactful writing.
In today's landscape, writers are encouraged to focus on developing their unique personalities, sensibilities, and perspectives to maintain relevance. These qualities, expressed through their prose and other forms of media, remain critical in creating pieces that resonate deeply with readers. AI, despite its technical advancements, struggles with the aspects of writing that demand a personal touch—such as the ability to convey genuine emotion, thoughtful reflection, and a sense of connection.
Moreover, the conversation emphasized the enduring value of human-authored works in fostering authenticity and meaningful engagement. Readers continue to seek connections that feel real and relatable, a dimension that AI-generated text cannot fully replicate. As such, the rise of AI in writing poses both opportunities and challenges, urging humans to embrace their individuality and leverage it as a competitive advantage in a rapidly transforming creative landscape."
I enjoyed this. I found it interesting that when the idea of AI reaching the point of being able to replicate human writing came up, Marriott’s main reservation was the impact it would have on those in his profession (i.e., the Luddite argument) whereas Leslie was searching for a deeper, ethical, or other argument for keeping writing/art in the hands of humans.
I am much deeper than James
I enjoyed that Ian. You two bounce off each other nicely.
Sadly, my attention span for podcasts is incredibly limited so I copy and pasted the transcript for this into Word and asked copilot to summarize, this was the result:
"AI and Writing in the Age of Machines
The conversation delved into the intricate dynamics of AI's role in the realm of writing, highlighting its strengths and limitations. While AI demonstrates remarkable proficiency in generating well-structured and stylistically appealing prose, it is unable to emulate the depth, intentionality, and purpose that come from human experience. The participants discussed how AI democratizes writing by enabling more people to produce content of acceptable quality, but it falls short in capturing the innate human curiosity, emotional nuances, and authentic voice that characterize impactful writing.
In today's landscape, writers are encouraged to focus on developing their unique personalities, sensibilities, and perspectives to maintain relevance. These qualities, expressed through their prose and other forms of media, remain critical in creating pieces that resonate deeply with readers. AI, despite its technical advancements, struggles with the aspects of writing that demand a personal touch—such as the ability to convey genuine emotion, thoughtful reflection, and a sense of connection.
Moreover, the conversation emphasized the enduring value of human-authored works in fostering authenticity and meaningful engagement. Readers continue to seek connections that feel real and relatable, a dimension that AI-generated text cannot fully replicate. As such, the rise of AI in writing poses both opportunities and challenges, urging humans to embrace their individuality and leverage it as a competitive advantage in a rapidly transforming creative landscape."
How did it do? (apart from the dreaded 'delve')